![]() You may also want to check the HELP/ABOUT dialog to see what is shown there regarding the GL_RENDERER/GL_VENDOR strings, you can take a screen shot or copy things to the clipboard to post them here.FlightGear is an Open-Source flight simulator which has been an active project since 1996 and initially released in 1997 - In that nearly 20 year history a lot has changed. This shouldn't normally be the case, but it could explain low fps when using the minimal startup profile. Otherwise, it is possible that OpenGL commands are getting "emulated" by running on the CPU instead of the GPU. make sure that your OpenGL drivers are set up and working properly, by using a different OpenGL based game/simulator, such as either X-Plane (demo) or UrbanTerror, or an OpenGL benchmark like FurMark3D You can refer to the built-in system monitor to see what's going on there.įirst of all, I would however try something completely different, i.e. But 24 fps does seem very low given that particular startup profile, which makes FlightGear look like an 80s game and doesn't keep a lot of stuff running at all. That statement is only reliable if you use the exact same settings, especially location and aircraft are extremely important. People using such hardware are encouraged to do a lot of testing and provide feedback regualrly (use the issue tracker for bug reports) so that we can grow a list of features that are known to be problematic with certain hardware, and either make certain settings more configurable, or completely optional. Unfortunately, Intel graphics are considered fairly poor in comparison to NVIDIA and AMD/ATI - but you may be lucky using the instructions at: ![]() And integrated graphics (notebooks) are typically not suitable for a 3D simulator/game, especially not hardware that's much more than ~24-36 months. Thus, upgrading is basically not a good idea.Īnd don't expect things like Rembrandt to work on integrated GPU chipsets - Rembrandt must be generally considered "slow" and unmaintained these days unfortunately. even an MXM laptop will typically be designed for a certain GPU/power and GPU/Heat allowance. Overall, graphics on a laptop are not easily upgrade normally, not even those featuring MXM extension slots - the main bottleneck here is 1) power and 2) heat, i.e. This is a setting that would normally be accessed from your BIOS, sometimes there's special windows tools allowing to adjust such settings. This used to be very slow in comparison to dedicated RAM installed on the graphics card itself - however, PCI-Express makes it actually fairly fast. VRAM is typically fixed, except for hardware that uses so called "shared memory" where a fraction of the system memory can be allocated to be used as VRAM. RAM being emulated by your operating system using an image that is stored on disk, which makes RAM access extremely slow (swapping). Right, VRAM is VIDEO RAM, virtual RAM is something completely different, i.e. Thanks a ton for your time, and keep up the amazing work! Noah Posts: 20 Joined: Sat 2:35 am Callsign: Noah Version: 3.0.0 OS: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS ![]() Pretty bad.Ģ - Is there any other well-modeled passenger jets you love besides the Airbus a330-203 or Boeing 777-200 / 777-300? So I have two questions that are not necessarily related.ġ - Is there an way to increase my framerate while using Rembrandt shading? I'm currently at around 14 without Rembrandt and 5 with. I love how great it looks, but it's quite laggy on my laptop. I also recently discovered Rembrandt shading. I love it because it's extremely well-modeled and flies great! So far, 99% of all my time has been in the stunning Airbus a330-203. I can successfully fly and land a passenger jet using manual or ILS landings. I discovered FlightGear over a month ago and love it! Really made me happy that there was an open source alternative to FSX / X-Plane. I'm a web developer with a new found passion for avionics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |